Introduction

Recently, the European Parliament proposed that language AI models like ChatGPT should be listed under high-risk AI systems. While some celebrated this move, activists and observers felt it was just a small step towards addressing the issue of general-purpose AI. The Future of Life Institute’s Director of Policy, Mark Brakel, emphasized that other general-purpose AI systems should also be regulated. Furthermore, the European Parliament is still working on imposing stricter requirements on developers and users of ChatGPT and similar models.

The Upcoming Challenge of ChatGPT Regulation

The European Commission, EU Council, and Parliament are expected to negotiate the final version of the AI Act starting in April. This is where the issue of ChatGPT regulation could hit a deadlock. The EU Council, Parliament, and Commission will devise a common solution to regulate this emerging technology. Meanwhile, Big Tech firms, including Microsoft and Google, watch the negotiations closely. Microsoft’s Chief Responsible AI Officer, Natasha Crampton, suggested that general-purpose AI systems such as ChatGPT are hardly used for risky activities. However, the transparency activist group Corporate Europe Observatory claimed that industry actors, including Microsoft and Google, lobbied EU policymakers to exclude general-purpose AI like ChatGPT from the obligations imposed on high-risk AI systems.

It’s crucial to have a comprehensive approach to regulating AI systems, especially those that have the potential to create harmful content like ChatGPT. The negotiations for the AI Act will be a crucial moment for ChatGPT regulation, but it’s also essential to regulate other general-purpose AI systems. The goal should be to balance innovation and regulation to ensure that AI technology is used safely and ethically.

ChatGPT’s Response to Regulation

ChatGPT’s potential for creating misleading and harmful content is a cause for concern for some EU policymakers. When asked about regulation, ChatGPT responded that generative AI and large language models should be designated as high-risk technologies. It suggested implementing a framework for responsible development, deployment, and use of these technologies, which includes appropriate safeguards, monitoring, and oversight mechanisms. The EU, however, still has follow-up questions.

ChatGPT’s response to the EU’s concerns and suggestions for responsible development and deployment of its technology is commendable. It’s essential to strike a balance between innovation and regulation, and a comprehensive approach is necessary to address the challenges of AI system regulation. The negotiations for the AI Act will be a crucial moment for ChatGPT regulation, but it will also be important to regulate other general-purpose AI systems. Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that AI technology is used safely and ethically.

It’s also worth noting that the discussion around ChatGPT regulation is not limited to the EU. Other countries and regions are also grappling with the challenges of regulating AI systems. For example, in the United States, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released a framework for managing and mitigating risks associated with AI systems. The framework guides stakeholders in identifying and assessing the risks of AI systems and implementing appropriate controls.

The regulation of AI systems is a complex issue that requires collaboration among stakeholders, including policymakers, developers, and users. It’s critical to consider AI systems’ potential benefits and risks and ensure they are developed and used responsibly and ethically. ChatGPT’s response to the EU’s concerns is a step in the right direction, but it’s only the beginning.

Conclusion

While the European Parliament has taken a step towards ChatGPT regulation, activists and observers feel it is insufficient. The EU’s AI Act negotiations could be a challenge for ChatGPT law. How the EU will address the concerns about this emerging technology remains to be seen. ChatGPT recognizes its potential for creating harmful content and suggests a responsible deployment and use framework. It’s vital to strike a balance between innovation and regulation to ensure that AI technology is used safely and ethically.

In conclusion, regulating AI systems like ChatGPT is challenging and requires a comprehensive approach. While the European Parliament’s proposal is a step forward, other general-purpose AI systems also need to be regulated. The upcoming negotiations for the AI Act will be a crucial moment for ChatGPT regulation, and it remains to be seen how the EU will address the concerns of stakeholders. It’s essential to strike a balance between innovation and regulation to ensure that AI technology is used safely and ethically.